However it still bars a Catholic from the throne --- where's religious tolerance there -- It's (OK hideously unlikely) but somebody from the Taliban could become HMK or HMQ -- OK unlikely given that a Muslim would have problems being head of C.Of E of course but it's theoretical -- say if William converted to Islam for example !!!!!! again 99999999% B/S but I'm just going by English Common Law. - The Royal Family are excluded from "Discrimination Laws etc -- so the religious discrimination thing couldn't be tested in Court. In any case I'm not sure what the difference really is between "High Angican C of E" and Catholics now the latter have dropped Latin. Apart from Women clergy theological dogma is pretty much the same.One minor clarification - the crown did not automatically pass to the 1st child upon death of ruling monarch. It actually passed to 1st son. It only used to pass to a daughter if she had no brothers even if she was oldest.
That is in part why there have been a lot more Kings than Queens.
The succession law has now been changed (only a few years ago actually), to reflect modern equality expectations, and now the crown passes to 1st child despite gender.
I did though enjoy that "Ruritanian spectacle" of those old stuffies in the Privy Council doing their gig this morning -- but I always thought a "Privy" was something else !!!!! so I really wondered what "public bogs" had to do with it all.
Anyway HMQ --R.I.P -- you didn't have to be British to like and admire her. Not sure about "The Newbie" though.
Cheers
jimbo
My Computer
System One
-
- OS
- Windows XP,7,10,11 Linux Arch Linux
- Computer type
- PC/Desktop
- CPU
- 2 X Intel i7