- Local time
- 11:02 AM
- Posts
- 1,990
- OS
- Windows 10 Pro
Backup and Restore (Windows 12) with integrated File History
My Computer
System One
-
- OS
- Windows 10 Pro
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am rather dead set against this, as I believe it would harm 3rd party tools like Macrium Reflect, Easeus etc. I just do not trust MS to come up with a robust offering and react quickly enough to bugs.Backup and Restore (Windows 12) with integrated File History
As long as the hourly updated 'everything' backup (OS + apps + user data) is provided by working in the background (i.e. not requiring a launch of the backup software) the prime considerations are quality, reliability, etc., and not provenance (MS or 3rd party)I am rather dead set against this, as I believe it would harm 3rd party tools like Macrium Reflect, Easeus etc. I just do not trust MS to come up with a robust offering and react quickly enough to bugs.
To me, one of the key reasons for a good 3rd party backup is to protect against Windows issues, and it seems to me to be a circular argument to use a windows feature to protect against Windows issues.
It's already been tried and found wanting . . . either has already been or going to be depracated IIRC.Backup and Restore (Windows 12) with integrated File History
My suggestion is about something much more advanced, a brief description is in post #84It's already been tried and found wanting . . . either has already been or going to be depracated IIRC.
Sure, I am having fun myself, what I suggested is something quite ancient, it is the "Holy Grail" of backup, i.e. real time backup of everything (OS, apps, user data)Haydon,
You do realise that this thread is just a bit of fun? MS are not going to read it for inspiration.
Denis
Same as using an Anti Virus prgram on an infected computer to "repair the machine after the OS has been compromised". Would you deliberately fly in a defective plane and then attempt to repair it while it's in the air. !!!I am rather dead set against this, as I believe it would harm 3rd party tools like Macrium Reflect, Easeus etc. I just do not trust MS to come up with a robust offering and react quickly enough to bugs.
To me, one of the key reasons for a good 3rd party backup is to protect against Windows issues, and it seems to me to be a circular argument to use a windows feature to protect against Windows issues.
I think the comparison is faulty. Windows Defender is checking up on Windows itself and it is one of the best.Same as using an Anti Virus prgram on an infected computer to "repair the machine after the OS has been compromised". Would you deliberately fly in a defective plane and then attempt to repair it while it's in the air. !!!
Windows has never reasonably done decent backups itself -- even in Windows early days things like Norton Ghost (anybody remember that) were excellent and could always do "bare Metal" restores too.
Cheers
jimbo
Hi thereI think the comparison is faulty. Windows Defender is checking up on Windows itself and it is one of the best.
It was one of the worst and became one of the best. It can go down too, everything goes up and down in cycles, Windows, backup, life itself ...
Maybe even the OS itself. !! who knows -- at home I'm probably on Linux 90% of the time with Windows 11 running as Virtual machines. Even photoshop runs fine in a Virtual environment on my hardware as I've got enough hardware power to pass thru a load of hardware to the VM so it can run at or very near "Natiive speed".Sure @jimbo45 and like Windows Defender, one day MS can make its own Backup and Restore from one of the worst to one of the best too
Like I wrote in the above in post #84 the quality of these utilities don't depend on provenance, MS or third party can do equally well, it is an open race.
And I added in post #92 that the winners of the open race will change over time, like everything else always change, too.
Yeah, sure, nothing is immune from going up and down, it's no different for Windows OS and other OSs for that matter.Maybe even the OS itself. !! who knows -- at home I'm probably on Linux 90% of the time with Windows 11 running as Virtual machines. Even photoshop runs fine in a Virtual environment on my hardware as I've got enough hardware power to pass thru a load of hardware to the VM so it can run at or very near "Natiive speed".
Graphics and Disk I/O are the areas of most interest. On a Dual physical processor system ( 2 physically separate processors - not talking about multi cores here) and assigning one of the physical CPU's to the VM also is a winner. Virtual network adapters also shouldn't slow down network traffic on a smallish home LAN.
Cheers
jimbo
Yep.. we had high hopes... but nay.Hi,
Linux is a sad joke compared to windows.
Hi,Yep.. we had high hopes... but nay.
Mark Shuttleworth sold out with this WSL stuff - he is not a Steve Jobs, unfortunately (saying this as a fellow countryman and rather fond of the guy)