I have to admit that the Canary builds are very boring. I also have to say that if the Canary Builds are so HOT off the presses, why are things in the Dev builds being released to the Canary Builds. Shouldn't it be the other way around?
Yep - there is no longer any logic in Insiders.
Canary should be for speculative idea testing - no guarantee any udea will land in any release version
Dev similar but ideas are considered more likely to land in release version. Such ideas should have been tested in Canary. Still no guarantee ideas will land in release version but more likely
Beta again similar but ideas are considered likely to land in release version but still no 100% guarantee. Ideas ahould have cascaded from Dev and should be more stable.
In other words, cascade ideas C to D to B, polishing idea as it goes.
Key question - do we need separate Dev/Canary at all?
The present random implementations just shows a complete lack of coordination with left and right hands not knowing what is going on.
Furthermore A, B testing is 100% cow dung. It means there are two versions of every Insider build to further confuse Insiders.
I kind of feel that the Insider Programme has outlived its usefulness. As Insiders, we are being divided and conquered so we can never unite en masse telling MS know.
