- Local time
- 12:14 PM
- Posts
- 1,904
- OS
- WIN 11, WIN 10, WIN 8.1, WIN 7 U, WIN 7 PRO, WIN 7 HOME (32 Bit), LINUX MINT
Not video cards, but I had more than a couple of printers that the manufacturer did not upgrade drivers for so would not work with Vista / 7 at all.
And it's not a scare tactic. It's planned obsolescence. A slightly different take, but nonetheless, along the lines of what you say.
Personally, though, I prefer the security. You may not like it - but too many #%^$#@%^ end users out there who have 0 clue as to PC security and how to stay safe. If Linux has been doing security like this all along, why is it wrong for Microsoft to start implementing it?
Turns out I had a new UEFI Firmware update waiting for me.
View attachment 65701
So, I installed it this morning, and then went back and set up TPM to use the physical module (apologies for the blurriness, I snapped the pics really quickly as I needed to get my system back up and running):
View attachment 65702 View attachment 65704 View attachment 65703
Technically, after disabling fTPM I shouldn't need to change the value ofDevice Select
but I always set it manually anyway, just in case the value forAMD fTPM Switch
gets altered back, the value underneath will still bne (hopefully!) set to use the physical module.
Of course, there is also the fact that I've probably performed over ten thousand BIOS and UEFI firmware updates in my lifetime, and this particular rig, alone, I've probably performed something on the order of 20 (unique) UEFI firmware updates, so I know exactly where to go. That definitely helps a lot.
Interesting. Normally when I see that message, it results from attempting to install a 32 bit driver in a 64 bit OS. I didn't realize that Intel's setup gives virtually the same error message because of a .Net imcompatibility (and that should never be the case, because .Net is supposed to be interoperable in the first place).
Gotta love Intel. Lol.
Call me an old chrone but I don't wanna fool with that. I keep wondering how many times I'm going to have to go into my BIOS after an update to straighten things out again. I suppose I could just turn updates off and wait until something crucial emerges. I used to love playing with my new toys. Perhaps one day I'll get one for my "Win 11 ready" AMD build that wasn't so ready after all (despite what the annoying nagware kept telling me) just because I'll have a new toy to play with and waste time on.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1c80/a1c806efc07ba5d6b5c7c0f95df4b8582e42f115" alt="Cool :cool: :cool:"
Should we take wagers, John? How long before you have to go back in to tweak again. A week? A month? By all means keep us posted. This is the only way we can learn. I sincerely appreciate the work you're doing here because one day I might have to refer to it. Count yourself among the pioneers and early explorers. AMD users need to see this.
Yup. Intel is really losing it. They're losing their popular features and they're losing customers too. My last personal build for my own use wasn't AMD by happenstance. Admittedly, Intel blames Microsoft's security standards (I read it on their own site) for all this feature dropping. Perhaps they have a point. They didn't come straight out and say it was TPM, of course, because they're also part of the TCG protection Syndicate errrm... "Consortium". They all made us an offer we couldn't refuse and that includes AMD. They have each other's backs. So maybe we gotta love 'em all because they all do such a swell job looking out for each other. As for the domestic end user, well... It's bizznizz as usual: Buy more!
The pictures are clear enough for this old man's eyes. I can read everything just fine. Personally, I'm all for security. I'm just not up to false promises and monopolies that look out for eachother but don't really care about the little guy. The trusted platform isn't about whether we can trust the Consortium. TPM is about whether they can trust the end user to surrender their ownership of the hardware to the Consortium. Smarter men than myself have said so and by observing the TPM ten year track record I'm inclined to believe them. My conclusion is that TPM is not there for my protection. It's not there for my convenience. It's not there for better performance. It's not even there for my entertainment. So what is it there for? A: It's there for the consortium.
My Computer
System One
-
- OS
- WIN 11, WIN 10, WIN 8.1, WIN 7 U, WIN 7 PRO, WIN 7 HOME (32 Bit), LINUX MINT
- Computer type
- PC/Desktop
- Manufacturer/Model
- DIY, ASUS, and DELL
- CPU
- Intel i7 6900K (octocore) / AMD 3800X (8 core)
- Motherboard
- ASUS X99E-WS USB 3.1
- Memory
- 128 GB CORSAIR DOMINATOR PLATINUM (B DIE)
- Graphics Card(s)
- NVIDIA 1070
- Sound Card
- Crystal Sound (onboard)
- Monitor(s) Displays
- single Samsung 30" 4K and 8" aux monitor
- Screen Resolution
- 4K and something equally attrocious
- Hard Drives
- A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W
Ports X, Y, and Z are reserved for USB access and removable drives.
Drive types consist of the following: Various mechanical hard drives bearing the brand names, Seagate, Toshiba, and Western Digital. Various NVMe drives bearing the brand names Kingston, Intel, Silicon Power, Crucial, Western Digital, and Team Group. Various SATA SSDs bearing various different brand names.
RAID arrays included:
LSI RAID 10 (WD Velociraptors) 1115.72 GB
LSI RAID 10 (WD SSDS) 463.80 GB
INTEL RAID 0 (KINGSTON HYPER X) System 447.14 GB
INTEL RAID 1 TOSHIBA ENTERPRIZE class Data 2794.52 GB
INTEL RAID 1 SEAGATE HYBRID 931.51 GB
- PSU
- SEVERAL. I prefer my Corsair Platinum HX1000i but I also like EVGA power supplies
- Case
- ThermalTake Level 10 GT (among others)
- Cooling
- Noctua is my favorite and I use it in my main. I also own various other coolers. Not a fan of liquid cooling.
- Keyboard
- all kinds.
- Mouse
- all kinds
- Internet Speed
- 360 mbps - 1 gbps (depending)
- Browser
- FIREFOX
- Antivirus
- KASPERSKY (no apologies)
- Other Info
- I own too many laptops: A Dell touch screen with Windows 11 and 6 others (not counting the other four laptops I bought for this household.) Being a PC builder I own many desktop PCs as well. I am a father of five providing PCs, laptops, and tablets for all my family, most of which I have modified, rebuilt, or simply built from scratch. I do not own a cell phone, never have, never will.